Outsourcing relationships: Strategies, challenges, and best practices
Keywords:
blockchain, contract governance, humanitarian logistics, public sector procurement, risk assessment, Strategic outsourcing, UN peacekeeping, vendor performance managementAbstract
This study examines the transformation of outsourcing from a peripheral cost-saving measure into a strategic function within non-profit and public sector operations. Using United Nations (UN) peacekeeping missions as a high-stakes case, it addresses persistent gaps in governance, performance measurement, and risk management. A mixed-methods design integrates Transaction Cost Economics, the Resource-Based View, and Relational View Theory with empirical evidence drawn from 1,200 UN procurement contracts (2015–2023), thematic analysis of 12 mission reports, and 35 interviews with procurement officers in Mali, South Sudan, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. A comparative case study of six logistics vendors within the MINUSCA mission in the CAR further grounds the analysis. Findings reveal that structured outsourcing models reduce costs by 18–32%, performance scorecards raise service-level agreement compliance by 25%, and dynamic risk tools cut supply chain disruptions by 40% in conflict zones. Blockchain-enabled contract transparency shortens payment delays by 35%, strengthening operational trust. Practically, the research delivers a unified outsourcing scorecard for non-profits, standardised ethical contract templates, AI-driven vendor assessment tools, and frameworks that align fiscal efficiency with humanitarian mandates. These contributions advance both scholarly understanding and practitioner capacity in volatile environments.
Downloads
References
Amnesty International (2022). Qatar: World Cup of Shame. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org (Accessed: 10 July 2023).
Amnesty International (2023). Cobalt Mining in the DRC: Human Rights Risks. Available at: https://www.amnesty.org (Accessed: 10 August 2023).
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barrett, P. & Baldry, D. (2003). Facilities Management: Towards Best Practice. 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley.
Basel Action Network (BAN) (2020). Toxic Trade: E-Waste Dumping in Ghana. Seattle: BAN.
Bhagwat, R. & Sharma, M. K. (2007a). Performance measurement of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53(1), 43-62.
Bhagwat, R. and Sharma, M.K. (2007b). Performance measurement of supply chain management using the analytical hierarchy process. Production Planning & Control, 18(8), 666-680.
Bocken, N. M., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039
Camp, R.C. (1989) Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices. Milwaukee: ASQC Quality Press.
Chan, J. (2021). Apple's Supply Chain: Power and Responsibility. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Crane, A., Matten, D., Glozer, S., & Spence, L. J. (2019). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford university press.
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard business review, 96(1), 108-116.
Deloitte (2020). Global outsourcing survey 2020: Cost optimization strategies. London: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.
Deloitte (2022). Global Outsourcing Survey 2022: Strategic Shifts in a Digital World. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com (Accessed: 19 May 2025).
Deloitte (2023). Global Outsourcing Survey 2023: The Future of Hybrid Partnerships. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com (Accessed: 10 May 2024).
Deva, S. (2022). Beyond the Race to the Bottom: Transnational Governance and Corporate Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of management review, 23(4), 660-679.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2023). Circular Economy in Fashion: Case Study Collection. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org
Fair Labor Association (2023). Nestlé Cocoa Supply Chain Report. Available at: https://www.fairlabor.org
Fairtrade International (2023). Unilever Tea Partnership Impact Report. Available at: https://www.fairtrade.net (Accessed: 20 August 2023).
Gartner (2023). Market Guide for Outsourcing Service Providers. Stamford, CT: Gartner Group.
Greaver, M.F. (2022). Strategic Outsourcing: A Structured Approach to Outsourcing Decisions and Initiatives. 3rd edn. New York: AMACOM.
Harland, C., Knight, L., Lamming, R., & Walker, H. (2005). Outsourcing: assessing the risks and benefits for organisations, sectors and nations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(9), 831-850.
Harvard Business Review (2020). 'The hidden costs of cross-cultural outsourcing', Harvard Business Review, 98(4), 42-45.
International Chamber of Commerce (2023). ICC Arbitration Rules. Paris: ICC Publishing.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2015). Quality management systems – Requirements (ISO 9001:2015). Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2017a). Collaborative Business Relationship Management Systems - Requirements and Framework (ISO 44001:2017). Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2017b). Information technology – Security techniques – Information security management systems – Requirements (ISO/IEC 27001:2017). Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2018). Risk Management - Guidelines (ISO 31000:2018). Geneva: ISO.
IoT Analytics (2023). Global IoT in Logistics Market Report 2023. Hamburg: IoT Analytics GmbH.
Isenberg, D. (2010). Shadow Force: Private Security Contractors in Iraq. New York: Praeger.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Kern, T., & Willcocks, L. (2000). Exploring information technology outsourcing relationships: theory and practice. The journal of strategic information systems, 9(4), 321-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00048-2
KPMG (2021a). Global Outsourcing Survey. Available at: https://www.kpmg.com
KPMG International (2021b). The Future of Outsourcing in the Public Sector: A Global Perspective. London: KPMG International Cooperative.
Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (2016). A new approach to automating services. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(1), 41-49.
Lacity, M., Solomon, S., Yan, A. & Willcocks, L. (2016). Business process outsourcing studies: A critical review and research directions. Journal of Information Technology, 31(3), 269-288.
McIvor, R. (2021). Strategic Outsourcing: Innovation, Transformation, and Cost Reduction. 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
OECD (2019). Siemens Case Study: Lessons in Anti-Corruption Compliance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2022). Dispute Resolution in Public Procurement: Best Practices. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264302345-en
Parmenter, D. (2015). Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs. Hoboken: Wiley.
Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
Reinecke, J. & Donaghey, J. (2021). The Accord after Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labor rights in Bangladesh. ILR Review, 74(5), 1263-1290.
Rose-Ackerman, S. & Palifka, B.J. (2022). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, J. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: Norton.
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International journal of production research, 57(7), 2117-2135.
Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. H. (2011). An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. International journal of production economics, 130(1), 1-15.
Smith, J. & Patel, R. (2022). Operational efficiency in UN peacekeeping: A functional analysis. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 25(3), 45-67.
Statista (2023). Global IT Outsourcing Market Size 2022-2027. Hamburg: Statista.
The Economist (2023). 'Outsourcing in conflict zones: Risks and rewards', The Economist, 12 May, p. 67.
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2021). World Investment Report 2021. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UN Global Compact (2022). Sustainable Supply Chains: A Guide for Practitioners. Available at: https://www.unglobalcompact.org
UN Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) (2020). Industrial Development Report 2020. Vienna: UNIDO.
UN Logistics (2023). Annual Logistics Performance Report. New York: United Nations Department of Operational Support.
UN Peacekeeping (2023). Peacekeeping Performance Dashboard 2023. Available at: https://peacekeeping.un.org
UN Policy Brief (2022a). Data protection in international outsourcing. New York: United Nations.
UN Policy Brief (2022b). Sustainable procurement in humanitarian operations. New York: United Nations.
UNHCR (2021). Supplier Code of Conduct. Geneva: UNHCR.
UNICEF (2023). Drones for Humanitarian Supply. Copenhagen: UNICEF Supply Division.
United Nations (2021). Peacekeeping Budget Report 2020-2021. UN Document PKO/2021/09.
United Nations (2022). Annual Statistical Report on United Nations Procurement. New York: UN Publications.
United Nations (2023a). Peacekeeping Budget Overview 2022-2023. Available at: https://peacekeeping.un.org
United Nations (2023b). Peacekeeping operations procurement manual. New York: UN Department of Operational Support.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (2022). Model Law on Procurement. Vienna: UNCITRAL.
United Nations Global Compact (2023a). Sustainable Outsourcing Guidelines. New York: UNGC.
United Nations Global Compact (2023b). Sustainable procurement in peacekeeping operations. New York: UNGC.
United Nations Global Marketplace (2023a). Vendor Portal User Guide. New York: UNGM.
United Nations Global Marketplace (2023b). Vendor Performance Dashboard. Available at: https://www.ungm.org
United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) (2023). Best Practices in Vendor Performance Management. UNOPS/2023/PM/02.
United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (2023). Annual Procurement Review 2023. UN Document AUD/2023/05. New York: UN Audit Service.
United Nations Procurement Division (2023). Vendor Performance Evaluation Framework. UN Document PD/2023/08.
UNODC (2020). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Available at: https://www.unodc.org (Accessed: 20 July 2023).
Willcocks, L. (2020). Global business outsourcing: trends and challenges. in Galliers, R.D. and Leidner, D.E. (eds.) Strategic Information Management. 5th edn. London: Routledge, 245-272.
Willcocks, L. P., & Lacity, M. C. (Eds.). (2016). Advanced outsourcing practice: Rethinking ito, bpo and cloud services. Springer.
Willcocks, L., Lacity, M. & Craig, A. (2019). Robotic Process Automation and Artificial Intelligence. London: SB Publishing.
Williamson, O.E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
World Bank (2022a). Procurement Guidelines for Borrowers. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
World Bank (2022b). Benchmarking Public Procurement 2022. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank (2023a). Kenya Infrastructure Corruption Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank (2023b). Post-conflict procurement frameworks: Lessons from Mali (Working Paper No. 11234). Washington: World Bank Group.
World Food Programme (WFP) (2022). Blockchain for Zero Hunger: Building Blocks Initiative. Available at: https://www.wfp.org
World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (2023). Water Stewardship in Cocoa Supply Chains. Gland: WWF International.
Zimmermann, A. & Ravishankar, M. N. (2016). Knowledge transfer in IT offshoring relationships: The roles of social capital, efficacy, and outcome expectations. Information Systems Journal, 26(3), 223-256.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 International research journal of management, IT and social sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
