Contextual learning approach and performance assessment in mathematics learning

Authors

Keywords:

Conventional assessment, Formative assessment, Learning approach, Mathematics learning outcome, Mathematics;

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of formative assessment and learning approach to the mathematics learning outcome after controlling the numerical aptitude. It was a quasi-experiment with a sample of 186 students obtained by using multistage random sampling technique with 2x2 factorial designs. The data were analyzed by ANCOVA. After controlling the numerical aptitude, the results are: the mathematics learning outcome of the students who followed a contextual approach was better than the ones who followed a conventional learning approach, the mathematics learning outcome of the students who were given a performance assessment was better than the ones who were given a conventional assessment, the interaction between the learning approach and formative assessment affected the students learning outcome for mathematics, the students who followed a contextual learning approach were more suitable to be given a performance assessment, whereas the ones who followed a conventional learning approach were more appropriate to be given a conventional assessment. Based on the research findings, junior high school teachers are suggested to improve their students learning outcome for mathematics. Then, teachers need to use a learning approach and formative assessment accurately and correctly.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Sadaawi, A. S. (2007). An investigation of performance-based assessment in science in Saudi primary schools(Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University).

Butler, Susan M., and Nancy D. McMunn. (2006). Classroom Assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Carter, P. (2007). IQ and Aptitude Tests. Kogan Page Publishers.

Kadir, K. (2017). Meningkatan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Asesmen Kinerja Berbasis Masalah dan Model Pembelajaran. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, 7(3).

Kalchik, S., & Oertle, K. M. (2010). The theory and application of contextualized teaching and learning in relation to programs of study and career pathways. Transition Highlights, 2, 1-6.

Kerlinger, F. N., & Simatupang, L. R. (1990). Asas-asas penelitian behavioral. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Lee K.C. (2007). Alternative Assessment in My Mathematics Classroom. Jurong: Pearson Education Pte. Ltd.

Nitko, A. J. (1970). Criterion-Referenced Testing in the Context of Instruction.

Nitko, A. J. (2004). Continuous assessment and performance assessment. Retrived November, 11, 2006.

Pantiwati, Y. (2010). Pengaruh Jenis Asesmen Biologi dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif TPS (Think Pair Share) terhadap Kemampuan Kognitif, Bepikir Kritis, Berpikir Kreatif, dan Kesadaran Metakognitif Siswa SMA di Kota Malang.(Disertasi). DISERTASI dan TESIS Program Pascasarjana UM.

Semiawan, C. (1997). Perspektif pendidikan anak berbakat. Penerbit PT Grasindo.

Wardhani, S. (2014). Rumiati 2011 Instrumen penilaian hasil belajar matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Mahendra, I. W. E. (2016). Contextual learning approach and performance assessment in mathematics learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(3), 7–15. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/347

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles