Lifestyle of LGBT community in Pancasila legal country

I Nyoman Sujana; I Made Mardika; Ni Made Puspasutari Ujiyanti

doi:10.21744/irjmis.v6n1.585

Authors

I Nyoman Sujana
inyomansujanaa125@gmail.com
Postgraduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
I Made Mardika Postgraduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujiyanti Postgraduate Program, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

legal country, LGBT community, lifestyle, marriage, Pancasila

Abstract

The existence of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) communities in Indonesia is still a pro and contra. There are people who support the LGBT community as a social phenomenon, but there are also people who cannot yet accept the LGBT Community. Indonesia as a rule of law deserves to protect the entire Indonesian people and the entire bloodshed of Indonesia. But in reality, LGBT people still feel discriminatory treatment and tend to be marginalized groups in society. This paper seeks to understand behavior, lifestyle, and legal protection for LGBT communities in the State of Pancasila law. The approach used is interdisciplinary which combines methods of empirical legal research and cultural studies. The target of field studies reaches LGBT communities in the western, central, and eastern parts of Indonesia. The results of the study show that the behavior of the LGBT community is closed and inclusive, with a tendency to follow a modern trend. In the perspective of the State of Pancasila law, the LGBT community gets legal protection just like citizens in general, except in similar marriages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Muhtadi, J. F. (2005). An Intelligent authentication infrastructure for ubiquitous computing environments. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/11049

Browne, K., & Bakshi, L. (2013). Insider activists: The fraught possibilities of LGBT activisms from within. Geoforum, 49, 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.013

Cahill, S., Battle, J., & Meyer, D. (2003). Partnering, parenting, and policy: Family issues affecting Black lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people. Race and Society, 6(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.racsoc.2004.11.002

Eisenberg, M. E., & Wechsler, H. (2003). Social influences on substance-use behaviors of gay, lesbian, and bisexual college students: findings from a national study. Social science & medicine, 57(10), 1913-1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00057-1

Gadamer, H. G. (1986). The idea of the good in Platonic-Aristotelian philosophy. Yale University Press.

Indonesia, I. L. W. M., Indonesia, L. S., & Informasi, L. R. (2000). Kompas. com. IPMR, CSIS, LP3ES.

Kelly-Campbell, R. J., & Atcherson, S. R. (2012). Perception of quality of life for adults with hearing impairment in the LGBT community. Journal of communication disorders, 45(5), 367-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.05.002

Liu, R. T., & Mustanski, B. (2012). Suicidal ideation and self-harm in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. American journal of preventive medicine, 42(3), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.10.023

Mahfud, M. D. Moh.(2012). Politik Hukum di Indonesia.

Marzuki, M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.

No, U. U. (1). Tahun 1974 tentang.

Sitorus, J. H. E. (2016). Pancasila-based social responsibility accounting. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 700-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.054

Solmsen, F. (1964). Leisure and play in Aristotle's Ideal State. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, 107(3. H), 193-220. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41244222

Steinberger, H. (1987). Sovereignty. In Encyclopedia of Disputes Installment 10 (pp. 397-418). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-86241-9.50103-2

Titib, I. M. (2005). Dialog Ajeg Bali: perspektif pengamalan agama Hindu. Pāramita.