Renovated evaluative practices

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.709

Authors

  • Yolanda Inés España Bone Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, sede Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador
  • Yiria Giovinezza Macías Figueroa Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, sede Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador
  • José Gregorio Lucas Delgado Pontifica Universidad Catolica del Ecuador, sede Manabí, Portoviejo, Ecuador
  • Mayra Carlina Avellán Avellán Unidad Educativa Cristo Rey, Portoviejo, Ecuador

Keywords:

application, contemporary trends, renewed evaluation practice, significant learning, teaching-learning

Abstract

The evaluation of the learning acquired by the students has been the generative topic of the goals proposed in the teaching-learning process, from the teaching action. The evaluation is stimulating for the multiple intelligences as a thermometer of the degree of understanding of the speakers and the distance between knowledge and academic outdating is abysmal. Establishing as an objective, the application of renewed evaluation practices in the inter-learning process, from teaching, is essential to authentic evaluation. At present, emphasis is placed on contemporary evaluation trends applied by teachers with a view to integrative educational innovation that seeks to strengthen meaningful learning; It is intended to demonstrate the use and application of innovative techniques that guarantee the application of evaluation practices at the forefront so that teachers improve their educational work, with the possibility of improving the educational performance of the speakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aranda, E., Valladares, M., Martinez-Villacampa, M., Benavides, M., Gomez, A., Massutti, B., ... & Dueñas, R. (2008). Randomized study of weekly irinotecan plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (FUIRI) versus biweekly irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (FOLFIRI) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors Study. Annals of oncology, 20(2), 251-257.

Ayala Zuluaga, CF, Nore, O., Fredy, J., Zuluaga, A., & Enver, J. (2014). Assessment Practices as a Holistic Process. Folios , (40), 31-44.

Calatayud, M. (2014). Evaluation of teaching practice and educational quality: a chained relationship. Iberoamerican Education. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5876257

Cano, E., Lafuente, D., & Bastidas, D. M. (2010). Use of EIS for the evaluation of the protective properties of coatings for metallic cultural heritage: a review. Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, 14(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-009-0902-6

Carvajal, G., & Valencia, G. (2016). Decision making in the school classroom. Educational pen. Retrieved from http://revistasum.umanizales.edu.co/ojs/index.php/plumillaeducativa/article/view/1750/2648

Dalal, R. S., & Sharma, S. D. (2016). Political dimension of Indian federal system: an evaluation. International research journal of engineering, IT & scientific research, 2(7), 25-33.

Del Pozo, M. (2014). Intelligent learning. Tekman Books

Fundación, M. (2018). New tools for authentic evaluation. Obtained from www.fundaciónmapfre.org

Garay, J., Kiayias, A., & Leonardos, N. (2015, April). The bitcoin backbone protocol: Analysis and applications. In Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques (pp. 281-310). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Muñoz Olivero, JA, Villagra Bravo, CP, & Sepúlveda Silva, SE (2016). Teachers' Reflection Process to Improve Learning Assessment Practices in the Context of Education for Youngsters and Adults (EPJA). Folios , (44), 77-91.

Navarro Mosquera, N. G., Falconi Asanza, A. V., & Espinoza Cordero, J. (2017). Improving the evaluation process of students in basic education. revista universidad y sociedad, 9(4), 58-69.

Spiegel, MR, & Stephens, LJ (2000). Statistics: Schaum Collection . Bookman

Vásquez, F. (2005). Ask the essayist. Bogotá: Kimpres .

Zambrano, A., Huerta, M., Diaz, M., de Andrade, M., & Marchena, P. (2009). Quality of Service Evaluation of Telemedicine Network Design with IEEE 802.11 b Technology. In World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7-12, 2009, Munich, Germany (pp. 218-221). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03904-1_61

Published

2019-08-22

How to Cite

Bone, Y. I. E., Figueroa, Y. G. M., Delgado, J. G. L., & Avellán, M. C. A. (2019). Renovated evaluative practices. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.709

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 5 (2019): September

Section

Peer Review Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.