Fraud pentagon theory in detecting financial perception of financial reporting with good corporate governance as moderator variable
Keywords:
financial reporting, fraud pentagon theory, good corporate governance, moderator variable, perceptions of fraudulentAbstract
This study aims to provide empirical evidence about fraud pentagon theory in detecting perceptions of fraud with good corporate governance as moderating. The study was conducted at all PT BPRs in Bali Province who held positions as directors and commissioners. The sampling technique uses saturated samples and uses the Yamane formula and produces 225 samples that are worthy of study. The data analysis technique used in moderated regression analysis. The test results found that the pentagon theory fraud indicator namely pressure negatively affects the perception of fraudulent financial reporting. Opportunities and rationality have a positive effect on perceptions of financial reporting fraud. Competence and arrogance do not affect the perception of financial reporting fraud. GCG weakens the negative effect of pressure on perceptions of fraudulent financial reporting. GCG weakens the positive influence of opportunity and rationality on the perception of fraud. GCG does not moderate the effect of competence and arrogance on perceptions of fraudulent financial reporting, but GCG is a type of potential moderation for the interaction of competence and arrogance.
Downloads
References
Akbar, T. (2017). The determination of fraudulent financial reporting causes by using pentagon theory on manufacturing companies in indonesia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 14(5), 106-133.
Aprilia, A. (2017). Analisis pengaruh fraud pentagon terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan beneish model pada perusahaan yang menerapkan asean corporate governance scorecard. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(1), 101-132.
Aprilla, Vivi Rizkiana., Adri Satriawan Surya, R., & Zarefar, Arumega. (2018). Pengaruh Financial Stability, External Pressure, Ineffective Monitoring, Change in Auditor, Change in Director dan Frequent Number of CEO's Picture terhadap Financial Statement Fraud dalam Perspektif Fraud Pentagon (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI 2011-2016). JOM FEB, 1(1), 1-15.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2018). Report to the Nations 2018, Global Study on Occupational Fraud and Abuse - Asia Pacific Edition. United States.
Astuti, M. A., Rozali, R. D. Y., & Cakhyaneu, A. (2019). Prevention of Fraud in Sharia Banking in Indonesia through Implementation of Sharia Corporate Governance. KnE Social Sciences, 183-202.
Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Daat, S. C. (2018). Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Daerah, 13(1), 114-134.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people's money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.
Crowe, H. (2011). The Mind Behind The Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Element.
Danuta, K. S. (2017). Crowe’s Fraud Pentagon Theory dalam Pencegahan Fraud pada Proses Pengadaan melalui E-Procurement. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jka.v1i2.826
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23.
Husmawati, P., Septriani, Y., Rosita, I., & Handayani, D. (2017, October). Fraud Pentagon Analysis in Assessing the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Statement (Study on Manufacturing Firms Listed in Bursa Efek Indonesia Period 2013-2016). In International Conference of Applied Science on Engineering, Business, Linguistics and Information Technology (pp. 45-51). ICo-ASCNITECH.
In'airat, M. (2015). The Role of Corporate Governance in Fraud Reduction-A Perception Study in the Saudi Arabia Business Environment. Journal of Accounting & Finance (2158-3625), 15(2).
Ismiyanti, F., & Prastichia, C. (2015). Mekanisme Corporate Governance dan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan [Mechanisms of Corporate Governance and Financial Statement Fraud]. DeReMa (Development Research of Management): Jurnal Manajemen, 10(2), 200-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.19166/derema.v10i2.171
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Junardi., Nella, Yantiana., & Khristina, Yunita. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap fraudulent financial reporting dengan Menggunakan Model Altman (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Keuangan dan Perbankan di Indonesia. Tesis. Universitas Tanjungpura.
Kathleen, M. E. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. The academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
Kurnia, Aidil Adherian., & Anis, Idrianita. (2017). Analisis Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Menggunakan Fraud Score Model. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XX. Jember.
Kusuma, I., Perdana, H. D., & Suranta, S. (2017). Fraudulent financial reporting by district/municipal government in indonesia1. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 2(1), 27-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.17.02.01.03
Kwatingtyas, L. P. A. (2017). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal dan Manajemen Risiko Pada Good Corporate Governance Serta Implikasinya Dalam Pencegahan Fraud (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis).
Luthan, E., & Satria, I. (2016). The Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism to Earnings Management Before and After IFRS Convergence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.021
Nindito, M. (2018). Financial Statement Fraud: Perspective of the Pentagon Fraud Model in Indonesia. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal.
Nurkhin, A. (2018). What Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior? From Fraud Triangle to Fraud Pentagon Perspective. KnE Social Sciences, 154-167. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3126
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2019). Daftar Alamat Kantor Pusat BPR 042019. April. OJK. Indonesia.
Pamungkas, I. D., Ghozali, I., Achmad, T., Khaddafi, M., & Hidayah, R. (2018). Corporate Governance Mechanisms in Preventing Accounting Fraud: A Study of Fraud Pentagon Model. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(2).
Perhimpunan Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Indonesia. (2019). Daftar Anggota Perbarindo Se-Bali. September. PERBARINDO Denpasar Utara. Denpasar.
Pramana, Y., Suprasto, H. B., Putri, I. G. A. M. D., & Budiasih, I. G. A. N. (2019). Fraud factors of financial statements on construction industry in Indonesia stock exchange. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.313
Prasmaulida, S. (2016). Financial statement fraud detection using perspective of fraud triangle adopted by SAS No. 99. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 1(2), 317-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.16.01.02.24
Puspitha, M. Y., & Yasa, G. W. (2018). Fraud pentagon analysis in detecting fraudulent financial reporting (study on Indonesian capital market). International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 42(5), 93-109.
Quraini, F., & Rimawati, Y. (2018). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud Pentagon Analysis. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 6(2), 105-114.
Rengganis, R. M. Y. D., Sari, M. M. R., Budiasih, I. G. A. N., Wirajaya, I. G. A., & Suprasto, H. B. (2019). The fraud diamond: element in detecting financial statement of fraud. International research journal of management, IT and social sciences, 6(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n3.621
Rukmana, H. S. (2018). Pentagon Fraud Affect on Financial Statement Fraud and Firm Value Evidence in Indonesia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 16(5).
Sanjaya Adi Putra, G., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). The effect of auditor experience, type of personality and fraud auditing training on auditors ability in fraud detecting with professional skepticism as a mediation variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(2), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n2.604
Saputra, A. (2017). Pengaruh Sistem Internal Kontrol, Audit Internal dan Penerapan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kecurangan (Fraud) Perbankan (Studi Kasus pada Bank Syariah Anak Perusahaan BUMN di Medan). Owner, 1(1).
Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan dan Bisnis, 11(1), 11-23.
Setiawati, E., & Baningrum, R. M. (2018). Deteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon: Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Listed di BEI Tahun 2014-2016. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 3(2), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v3i2.6645
Siddiq, F. R., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar, Z. (2017). Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud.
Tessa, C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent financial reporting: pentagon testing fraud theory in financial sector and banking in Indonesia. In National Symposium on Accounting XIX. Lampung: National Symposium on Accounting XIX. Available at: http://lib. ibs. ac. id/materi/Prosiding/SNA% 20XIX (Vol. 20, p. 19).
Utama, I. G. P. O. S., Ramantha, I. W., & Badera, I. D. N. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor dalam perspektif fraud triangle sebagai prediktor fraudulent financial reporting. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 251-278. https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2018.v07.i01.p09
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). Positive accounting theory.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud.
Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S. A., & Ansar, R. (2017). Pengaruh Diamond Fraud dan Tingkat Religiuitas terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi pada Mahasiswa S-1 di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi Se Kota Ternate). https://doi.org/10.24252/.v3i2.4546
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
