Tenure amnesty for the upstream oil and gas industry in the forest area

Meyzi Heriyanto; Ali Yusri; Muchid Muchid; Bayu Andrianto Wirawan

doi:10.21744/irjmis.v7n5.987

Authors

Meyzi Heriyanto
meyzi.heriyanto@lecturer.unri.ac.id
Department of Business Administration, Fisip, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Ali Yusri Department of Government Studies, Fisip, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Muchid Muchid Department of Government Studies, Fisip, Universitas Riau, Indonesia
Bayu Andrianto Wirawan Doctoral Student of Environmental Science, Universitas Riau, Indonesia

Keywords:

amnesty, forest area, gas industry, tenure, upstream oil

Abstract

The overlap of the operational area of ??the upstream oil and gas industry with forest areas in the Rokan Block as the main contributor to 40 percent of the national oil, threatens the contribution that can be given to national oil needs. This study aimed to analyze the implementation of tenure amnesty to resolve tenurial conflicts in the upstream oil and gas and forest areas. Descriptive analysis was carried out by using the IRAC reasoning scheme, namely issue (I), rule of law (R), analysis (A), and conclusion (C) as forming policy analysis. The findings of this study showed that there were two solutions to resolve tenure conflicts in r upstream oil and gas industrial land and forest areas, namely IPPKH (Borrowing and Use of Forest Areas Permits) and tenure amnesty. Tenure amnesty is better mechanism than IPPKH both socially, economically and institutionally. The presence of the upstream oil and gas industry through tenure amnesty in forest areas, can improve the performance of ecosystem management through harmonization of operations that is followed up by collaborative program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anjulian, L. (2017). Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan di Kecamatan Pekanbaru Kota Tahun 2007 Dan Tahun 2014 (Doctoral dissertation, UNIMED). https://doi.org/10.24114/tgeo.v6i2.8673

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, Allyn and Bacon. Boston et al, 238-267.

Gaveau, D. L., Sheil, D., Salim, M. A., Arjasakusuma, S., Ancrenaz, M., Pacheco, P., & Meijaard, E. (2016). Rapid conversions and avoided deforestation: examining four decades of industrial plantation expansion in Borneo. Scientific reports, 6(1), 1-13.

Hadjisaroso. (1976). Perencanaan Pembangunan Regional dan Daerah. Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.

Haines-Young, R. (2009). Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land use policy, 26, S178-S186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.009

Harun, J. (2009). Permasalahan Minyak Dan Gas (Migas) Di Riau. Jurnal Ekonomi, 17(03).

Kim, M. J., & Hall, C. M. (2020). Can sustainable restaurant practices enhance customer loyalty? The roles of value theory and environmental concerns. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 43, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.03.004

Le Quéré, C., Andrew, R. M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Hauck, J., Pongratz, J., ... & Arneth, A. (2018). Global carbon budget 2018. Earth System Science Data, 10(4), 2141-2194. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2141-2018

Le Quéré, C., Korsbakken, J. I., Wilson, C., Tosun, J., Andrew, R., Andres, R. J., ... & van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Drivers of declining CO 2 emissions in 18 developed economies. Nature Climate Change, 9(3), 213-217.

Margono, B. A., Potapov, P. V., Turubanova, S., Stolle, F., & Hansen, M. C. (2014). Primary forest cover loss in Indonesia over 2000–2012. Nature climate change, 4(8), 730-735. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2277

McNeill, J., Alves, D., Arizpe, L., Bykova, O., Galvin, K., Kelmelis, J., ... & Riebsame, W. (1994). Toward a typology and regionalization of land-cover and land-use change: Report of working group B. Changes in land use and land cover: A global perspective, 4, 55-71.

Moleong, L. J. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan 25.

Murdiyarso, D., Purbopuspito, J., Kauffman, J. B., Warren, M. W., Sasmito, S. D., Donato, D. C., ... & Kurnianto, S. (2015). The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 5(12), 1089-1092.

Nugroho, I., & Dahuri, R. (2004). Pembangunan Wilayah. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Jogja Mandiri.

Skogen, K., Helland, H., & Kaltenborn, B. (2018). Concern about climate change, biodiversity loss, habitat degradation and landscape change: Embedded in different packages of environmental concern?. Journal for Nature Conservation, 44, 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2018.06.001

Soler Luque, Z., & Kostecka, J. (2018). Biodiversity loss, the causes, the state and basic form of nature protection in Spain and Poland.

Sugiyono, S. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R & D. Bandung Alf.

Tittensor, D. P., Walpole, M., Hill, S. L., Boyce, D. G., Britten, G. L., Burgess, N. D., ... & Baumung, R. (2014). A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science, 346(6206), 241-244.

Weruin, U. U. (2017). Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 374-395.

Zulkarnain, M.T. (2018). Penilaian Tingkat Lansekap Nilai Konservasi Tinggi (NKT) dan Stok Karbon Tinggi (SKT) untuk Mendukung Mitigasi Perubahan Iklim (Studi Kasus: Provinsi Sumatera Selatan, Indonesia). (Thesis). Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Indonesia.