Correlation between farmers' income and social changes case study in Kawangkoan District and Tareran District, Minahasa Regency, North Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

Joula S. Kalangi; Rieneke R. Kalalo

doi:10.21744/irjmis.v9n2.2048

Authors

Joula S. Kalangi
joulakalangi64@gmail.com
Lecture at Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Indonesian Christian University in Tomohon, Indonesia
Rieneke R. Kalalo Lecture at Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Indonesian Christian University in Tomohon, Indonesia

Keywords:

agricultural, farmer families, farmer, farmer’s income, social changes

Abstract

This research is about how the occurrence of social changes in society in relation to farmers' income, so the problem was to find out the extent to which farmers' income related to social change. The aim was to analyze the relationship between farmers’ income and social changes that occurred in two sub-districts, namely Kawangkoan and Tareran. The population in this study was taken from farmer families who got their income from agricultural products amounting to 626 households and then determined the samples from 125 families. By using the quantitative analysis technique of product-moment correlation, the results showed the magnitude of the correlation coefficient which was developed into a coefficient of determination than the interpretation of r2 = 0.9216 or 92.16% explained that an increase in the income of 1 unit would be followed by an increase in social change of 0.9216. In other words, the increase in farmers’ income by 1% would increase the social change by 92.16%. From the results above, it is clear that it supports the formulation of the hypothesis that there is a positive relationship between farmers’ income with social changes in the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abokyi, E., Strijker, D., Asiedu, K. F., & Daams, M. N. (2020). The impact of output price support on smallholder farmers' income: evidence from maize farmers in Ghana. Heliyon, 6(9), e05013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05013

Akbari, M., Alamdarlo, H. N., & Mosavi, S. H. (2020). The effects of climate change and groundwater salinity on farmers’ income risk. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105893

Aremu, A. Y., & Shola, A. D. (2016). Business plan for Ade farm food production company NIG LTD. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(7), 27-42. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/383

Basrowi, S. (2008). Memahami penelitian kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 12(1), 128-215.

Brodt, S., Klonsky, K., & Tourte, L. (2006). Farmer goals and management styles: implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agricultural systems, 89(1), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.005

Brudermann, T., Reinsberger, K., Orthofer, A., Kislinger, M., & Posch, A. (2013). Photovoltaics in agriculture: A case study on decision making of farmers. Energy Policy, 61, 96-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.081

Ceballos, F., Kannan, S., & Kramer, B. (2020). Impacts of a national lockdown on smallholder farmers’ income and food security: Empirical evidence from two states in India. World Development, 136, 105069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105069

Chambers, R., & Ghildyal, B. P. (1985). Agricultural research for resource-poor farmers: the farmer-first-and-last model. Agricultural administration, 20(1), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-586X(85)90063-9

Holliday, A. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics, 98-110.

Kartono, K. (2013). Patologi Sosial. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.

Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007). Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food policy, 32(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003

Lauer, R. H. (2001). Perspektif Tentang Perubahan Sosial Terjemahan Dari Judul Asli Perpectives on Social Change.

Martono, N. (2014). Sosiologi perubahan sosial persfektif klasik, moderen. Posmoderen dan poskolonial, 419.

Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative health research, 28(3), 381-388.

Punch, K. F. (2013). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. sage.

Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2012). Teori Sosiologi Modern Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Sasrawan, I. P. H., & Yuliarmi, N. N. (2021). Factor analysis on the agricultural technology adoption and arabica coffee productivity in Kintamani District, Bangli Regency. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(6), 569-578. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n6.1940

Soekanto, S. (2014). Sosiologi suatu pengantar.

Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.

Suyanto, B. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sosial: Berbagai Alternatif Pendekatan. Prenada Media.

Thysen, I. (2000). Agriculture in the information society. Journal of agricultural engineering research, 76(3), 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0580

van Vliet, J. A., Schut, A. G., Reidsma, P., Descheemaeker, K., Slingerland, M., van de Ven, G. W., & Giller, K. E. (2015). De-mystifying family farming: Features, diversity and trends across the globe. Global food security, 5, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.03.001

Zaibet, L., Dharmapala, P. S., Boughanmi, H., Mahgoub, O., & Al-Marshudi, A. (2004). Social changes, economic performance and development: the case of goat production in Oman. Small Ruminant Research, 54(1-2), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.11.002