Classroom action research practices of state high school teachers in Bali province

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v5n5.288

Authors

  • Wayan Maba Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ida Bagus Ketut Perdata Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Ngurah Nila Putra Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar, Bali, Indonesia

Keywords:

Classroom action, High school, Practices, Research, Teachers

Abstract

The general purpose of this study was to find out the level of difficulty in preparing Classroom Action Research (CAR) Proposals, implementation and report writing of classroom action research conducted by state high school teachers in Bali Province. The present study was designed for two years, the study adopted the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate). The first year (2018) was defined as the phase of Define and Design, which aims to design CAR proposals in line with the Lesson Plan (LP), the implementation of CAR by state high school teachers and report writing linear with List of Proposed Establishment of Credit (LPEC). The second year (2019) was the Development and Dissemination phase. The activities in this phase were (a) enhancing the development and improvement of CAR of state high school teachers in accordance with the proposal model, the CAR implementation model designed based on LP and CAR report model through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) which was attended by High School Teachers, High School Principals, High School Supervisors, LPEC High School Teachers Team, and the CAR participants from the Department of Education and Sport, Bali Province. The results of the second year research were the CAR proposals were linear with teachers’ LP, Classroom LP implementation, learning schedule, and CAR report writings were linear with LPEC and publication on international journal and textbook writings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beane, J. A. (2016). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.

Calhoun, E. F. (1994). How To Use Action Research in the Self-Renewing School. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-1453 (Stock No. 1-94030, $6.95). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED370205

Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Ascd.

Dowden, T. (2007). Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 51-71. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03216857

Gabriel, J. B. (2005). How to think as a teacher leader. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Maba, W. (2017). Teacher’s Perception on the Implementation of the Assessment Process in 2013 Curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1-9. https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijssh/article/view/26

Maba, W. (2017). Teachers’ sustainable professional Development Through Classroom Action Research. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences 7 (8). http://ijmra.us/2017ijrss_august.php

Maba, W. (2017). The Implementation of Education National Standard in the Instrument of School Accreditation of Bali Province Education Authority. International Research Journal of Engineering, IT & Scientific Research (IRJEIS), 3(4), 1-6.

Maba, W., & Mantra, I. B. N. (2018). The primary school teachers’ competence in implementing the 2013 curriculum. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 42, p. 00035). EDP Sciences. https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/abs/2018/03/shsconf_gctale2018_00035/shsconf_gctale2018_00035.html

Maba, W., Perdata, I. B. K., & Astawa, I. N. (2017). Constructing Assessment Instrument Models for Teacher’s Performance, Welfare and Education Quality. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(3), 88-96. https://sciencescholar.us/journal/index.php/ijssh/article/view/59

Mantra, I. B. N. (2016). Promoting Primary School Teachers’ Competence through Dynamic Interactive Workshop and Partnership. Journal of College and University. This is an open access article under the, 2455, 8028. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/21a5/1bf7c1fd4af95e00a8f896443dd02aec0ca9.pdf

Murdoch, K. (1998). Classroom connections: Strategies for integrated learning. Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

Newmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. (2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(4), 297-321. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/01623737023004297

Nguyen, M. T. T. (2011). Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence?. RELC Journal, 42(1), 17-30. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0033688210390265

Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED090725

Whitaker, T. (2004). What great teachers do differently: Fourteen things that matter most. Larchmont, NY. Eye on Education, Inc.

Published

2018-09-16

How to Cite

Maba, W., Perdata, I. B. K., & Putra, I. G. N. N. (2018). Classroom action research practices of state high school teachers in Bali province. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(5), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v5n5.288

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles