Effect of Risk Preference, Professional Domination, Information, and Professional Relationship on Ethical Decision Making of Tax Consultants

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n4.675

Authors

  • Ida Bagus Widhi Aksiana Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Ketut Sujana Faculty of Economics and Business, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia

Keywords:

professional dominance, information current, professional relations, risk preference, tax consultant ethical decision making

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of risk preferences, professional dominance, current information, and professional relationships on tax consultant ethical decision making. This study uses a saturated sampling method with respondents being Tax Consultants Registered at the Indonesian Tax Consultant Association in the Bali Nusa Tenggara Region. Data collection methods used are questionnaires and data analysis using multiple linear regression. The results showed that risk preferences negatively affected the tax consultant's ethical decision making. Professional domination has a negative effect on tax consultant ethical decision making. Present information has a positive effect on tax consultant ethical decision making. Professional relations have a negative effect on tax consultant ethical decision making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonner, F., & Du Gay, P. (1992). Representing the enterprising self: thirtysomething and contemporary consumer culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 9(2), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026327692009002004

Dewi, I. G. A. A. P., & Dewi, P. P. (2018). Big Five Personality, Ethical Sensitivity, and Performance of Auditors. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(2), 195-209.

Dewi, P. P., & Dwiyanti, K. T. (2018). Professional commitment, self-efficacy and ethical decision auditor. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(6), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v5n6.379

Doyle, E., Hughes, J. F., & Summers, B. (2013). An empirical analysis of the ethical reasoning of tax practitioners. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 325-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1347-x

Doyle, M. C. (2004). U.S. Patent No. 6,745,998. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

El-Werfelli, M., Dunn, R., Redfern, M., & Brooks, J. (2008, September). Analysis of the national 8th November 2003 Libyan blackout. In 2008 43rd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2008.4651469

Fisher, R. W. (2005). Globalization and monetary policy (No. 118). Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A taxonomy of ethical ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 39(1), 175.

Kadous, K., & Magro, A. M. (2001). The effects of exposure to practice risk on tax professionals' judgements and recommendations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(3), 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1506/TF76-653L-R36N-13YP

Killian, S., & Doyle, E. (2004). Tax aggression among tax professionals: the case of South Africa. Journal of Accounting, Ethics and Public Policy, 4(3).

Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The anatomy of tax evasion. JL Econ. & Org., 5, 1.

Lisa, O., & Hermanto, B. (2018). The effect of tax amnesty and taxpayer awareness to taxpayer compliance with financial condition as intervening variable. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 5(2), 227-236.

Magro, J. R., Loyer, B. A., & Mehta, P. M. (2005). U.S. Patent No. 6,889,334. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

O’Higgins, E., & Kelleher, B. (2005). Comparative perspectives on the ethical orientations of human resources, marketing and finance functional managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(3), 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-3898-y

Pandey, M. (2017). Impact of goods and service tax (GST) on Indian tax structure. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 4(3), 22-33.

Pattiasina, V., Tammubua, M. H., Numberi, A., Patiran, A., & Temalagi, S. (2019). Capital Intensity and tax avoidance. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 58-71. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n1.250

Prena, G. D., Kustina, K. T., Dewi, I. G. A. A. O., Putra, I. G. C., & Krisnanda, R. A. (2019). Tax sanctions, tax amnesty program, and tax obligation placement towards compliance report on corporate taxpayers. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n1.249

Purnamasari, V., & Chrismastuti, A. A. (2006). Dampak reinforcement contingency terhadap hubungan sifat machiavellian dan perkembangan moral. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi, 9.

Sugiyono, D. R. (2012). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Syamsi, I. (2000). Dasar Kebijakan Keuangan Negara.

Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of management Review, 11(3), 601-617.

Trevino, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied psychology, 75(4), 378.

Wiguna, I. P. I., & Yadnyana, K. (2019). The role of working experience moderating the effect of emotional intelligence, intellectual intelligence, and spiritual intelligence on the ethical decision of tax consultants in Bali area. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(3), 18-28. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n3.624

Wittmer, D. P. (2010). Behavioral ethics in business organizations: What the research teachs us. Good business: Exercising effective and ethical leadership, 58-69.

Published

2019-07-15

How to Cite

Aksiana, I. B. W., & Sujana, I. K. (2019). Effect of Risk Preference, Professional Domination, Information, and Professional Relationship on Ethical Decision Making of Tax Consultants. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(4), 174–179. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n4.675

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4: July 2019

Section

Peer Review Articles
Copyright & Licensing

Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.

Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.