Teaching writing skills through genre: applying the genre-based approach in Iran
Keywords:
academic writing, argumentative rhetoric, consciousness-raising approach, EFL students, genre-based pedagogyAbstract
Developing effective argumentative and persuasive texts is a challenge for both native and non-native students of writing skills, where a lack of linguistic, rhetorical, and cultural awareness skills are major problems in effective written communication. International research results show that a Genre-Based Approach based in particular on Systemic Functional and Cognitive Linguistics allows students to take a significant leap towards controlling macro and micro-genre structures as well as language and that taking a consciousness-raising approach to genre seems to be a key contributing factor to better writing development. We report on the findings of two recent Iranian studies, one that implemented the Genre-Based Approach, and the other Mobile-Assisted Dynamic Assessment following mixed Product-Process methodology, as well as giving an overview of some recent research into the development of academic writing skills through genre teaching-learning in contrast to traditional approaches. Results show that, though traditional methodologies can have success, the Genre-Based Approach, with its focus on better genre characteristics identification along with improved teaching and learning methodology, combining elements of structure, language, rhetoric, and cultural contextualization, gives more rapid results, and leads to better and more confident writers, as well as better syllabus development.
Downloads
References
Abdel‐Malek, M. (2019). Writing recounts of habitual events: Investigating a genre‐based approach. Foreign Language Annals, 52(2), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12383
Alghamdi, E. A. (2014). Discourse markers in ESL personal narrative and argumentative papers: a qualitative and quantitative analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(4), 294-305.
Almacıoğlu, G., & Okan, Z. (2018). Genre-based approach to writing instruction for students at an English language and literature department. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460635
Andrews, R. (2005). Models of argumentation in educational discourse. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 25(1), 107-127. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.107
Arsyad, S. (1999). The Indonesian and English argument structure: a cross-cultural rhetoric of argumentative texts. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.22.2.06ars
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153
Bawarshi, A. S., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to history, theory, research, and pedagogy (p. 4). West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science (Vol. 356). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Byrnes, H. (2009). Instructed Foreign Language Acquisition as Meaning-making: A Systemic Functional Approach. Linguistics and Education, 20(1).
Caplan, N. A., & Farling, M. (2017). A dozen heads are better than one: Collaborative writing in genre‐based pedagogy. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 564-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.287
Caplan, N. A., & Farling, M. (2017). A dozen heads are better than one: Collaborative writing in genre‐based pedagogy. TESOL Journal, 8(3), 564-581.
Carless, D. (2012). From testing to productive student learning: Implementing formative assessment in Confucian-heritage settings. Routledge.
Cheng, A. (2011). ESP classroom research: Basic considerations and future research questions. New directions in English for specific purposes research, 44-72.
Choi, Y. H. (1988). Text structure of Korean speakers’ argumentative essays in English. World Englishes, 7(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1988.tb00226.x
Coffin, C., & Donohue, J. P. (2012). Academic Literacies and systemic functional linguistics: How do they relate?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.004
Coffin, C., Donohue, J., & North, S. (2013). Exploring English grammar: From formal to functional. Routledge.
Connor, U., & Tuija, H. (1988). A contrastive study of persuasive business correspondence: American and Japanese. Global Implications for Business Communications: Theory, Technology and Practice, 57-72.
Connor, U., Gorman, T., & Vahapassi, A. (1987). The argumentative/persuasive task. The IEA study of written composition, 1, 155-171.
Crowhurst, M. (1988). Research Review: Patterns of Development in Writing Persuasive/Argumentative Discourse.
Dastjerdi, V., & Shirzad, M. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction of metadiscourse markers on efl learners'writing performance.
Davis, L., & McKay, S. B. (1996). Structures and strategies: An introduction to academic writing. Macmillan Education AU.
Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC journal, 34(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003368820303400202
Derewianka, B. (2012). Knowledge about language in the Australian curriculum: English.
Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2016). Genre-Based Approach: What and How to Teach and to Learn Writing. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 45-51.
Dolgova, N., & Tyler, A. (2019). Applications of Usage-Based Approaches to Language Teaching. Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, 939-961. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_49
Dossoumou, A. M., Mehouenou, M. S., & Koukpossi, A. O. (2018). Appraising the impacts of cohesion and coherence in Benin SS3 EFL learners’ writing productions. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(5), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v4n5.293
Douangmala, P., & Widyantoro, A. (2018). The use of genre-based approach instruction to improve students’ ability in writing short-essays. International Journal of Science and Research, 7(5), 1141-1145.
Elachachi, H. (2015). Exploring cultural barriers in EFL Arab learners’ writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199(3), 129-136.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change (Vol. 10). Cambridge: Polity press.
Flowerdew, J. (2002). Genre in the classroom: A linguistic approach. Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives, 91-102.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Hodder Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Machine Translation: An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London, Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.
Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar third edition. London: Edward Arnold.
Hammond, J., & Macken-Horarik, M. (1999). Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL classrooms. Tesol Quarterly, 33(3), 528-544. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587678
Hirose, K. (2003). Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of second language writing, 12(2), 181-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00015-8
Horowitz, D. (1986). Process, not product: Less than meets the eye. TESOL quarterly, 20(1), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586397
Horverak, M. O. (2016, September). An experimental study on the effect of systemic functional linguistics applied through a genre-pedagogy approach to teaching writing. In Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 67-89). De Gruyter Open. https://doi.org/10.1515/yplm-2016-0004
Hounhanou, A. V. (2018). Evaluating Benin EFL Learners Writing Composition during Final Exam. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 4(2), 9-23.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of second language writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland, K., & Paltridge, B. (Eds.). (2011). Bloomsbury companion to discourse analysis. A&C Black.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL quarterly, 30(4), 693-722. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587930
Jalilifar, A. (2008). Discourse Markers in Composition Writings: The Case of Iranian Learners of English as a Foreign Language. English Language Teaching, 1(2), 114-122.
Jalilifar, A. (2014). Workplace discourse. In A. Jalilifar & S. E. Elhambakhsh (Eds), Directions in Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (pp. 125-194). Ahvaz, Iran: Chamran University Press
Jalilifar, A. R., & Shooshtari, Z. G. (2011). Metadiscourse awareness and ESAP comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850342
Jodairi Pineh, A., & Ariyanfar, S. (2018). Investigating Roles of Genre Teaching in the Development of EFL Learners' Academic Writing, MA thesis, Zanjan University.
Johns, A. M. (1993). Written argumentation for real audiences: Suggestions for teacher research and classroom practice. TESOL quarterly, 27(1), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586952
Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004892
Kapranov, O. (2017). The use of metonymy and metaphor in descriptive essays by intermediate and advanced EFL students. Linguistics Beyond and Within (LingBaW), 3(3), 87-101.
Knudson, R. E. (1994). An analysis of persuasive discourse: Learning how to take a stand. Discourse Processes, 18(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544892
Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing, research, theory, and applications. Pergamon.
Leńko-Szymańska, A. (2008). Non-native or non-expert? The use of connectors in native and foreign language learners’ texts. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère, (27), 91-108.
Lo, Y. Y., & Jeong, H. (2018). Impact of genre-based pedagogy on students’ academic literacy development in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Linguistics and Education, 47, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.08.001
Marandi, S. (2003). Metadiscourse in Persian/English master's theses: A contrastive study.
Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. Children writing: reader, 1, 984.
Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford University Press, USA.
Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford University Press, USA.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly journal of speech, 70(2), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
Miller, T. (1997). Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications.
Mohan, B. A., & Lo, W. A. Y. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586276
Muller, J. (2012). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum and education policy. Routledge.
Nasiri, M., & Moeinpour, L. (2018). Dynamic assessment of IELTS writing task one through mobile learning in the context of Iranian EFL learners. MA thesis, Zanjan University.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Paltridge, B. (2007). Approaches to genre in ELT. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 931-943). Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_62
Pennington, M. C. (1995). The teacher change cycle. Tesol Quarterly, 29(4), 705-731. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588171
Prodromou, L. (1995). The backwash effect: from testing to teaching. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.13
Rahimi, M. (2011). Discourse markers in argumentative and expository writing of Iranian EFL learners. World Journal of English Language, 1(2), 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v1n2p68
Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1994). Writing a book review: A unit of work for junior secondary English (Write it Right Resources for Literacy and Learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Scott, M., & Groom, N. (1999). Genre-based pedagogy: Problems and possibilities. Issues in EAP research and writing instruction. Reading: Centre for Applied Language Studies, University of Reading.
Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, 11-23.
Simin, S., & Tavangar, M. (2009). Metadiscourse knowledge and use in Iranian EFL writing. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly March 2009 Volume 11, Issue, 230.
Stuart-Smith, V. (1998). Constructing an argument in psychology: Rhetorical structure theory and the analysis of student writing. Researching academic literacies, 31-146.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tavakoli, M., Dabaghi, A., & Khorvash, Z. (2010). The Effect of Metadiscourse Awareness on L2 Reading Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners. English Language Teaching, 3(1), 92-102.
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58
Ueasiriphan, T., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2019). The Effects of Genre-Based Teaching on Enhancement of Thai Engineers' Technical Writing Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 723-738.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Whittaker, R., & Parejo, I. G. (2018). Teacher Learning for European Literacy Education (TeL4ELE): genre-based pedagogy in five European countries. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 31-57. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0021
Xeketwana, S. (2018). A theoretical approach to teaching academic literacy through the use of genres: A knowledge about language for preservice teachers. South African Journal of African Languages, 38(3), 349-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/02572117.2018.1518050
Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9426-9
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Articles published in the International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social sciences (IRJMIS) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant IRJMIS right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Users have the right to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles in this journal, and to use them for any other lawful purpose.
Articles published in IRJMIS can be copied, communicated and shared in their published form for non-commercial purposes provided full attribution is given to the author and the journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in IRJMIS volumes 7 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.
