The effect of the application of the contextual learning model on the ability of short story writing for class VII SMP

https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n6.1939

Authors

Keywords:

contextual, learning model, short story, significantly, writing

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of applying a contextual learning model on short story writing skills for seventh-grade students of SMP Negeri 35 Makassar. This type of this study was experimental research with quantitative analysis techniques that were numbered from the quick writing ability test results. The result of the data analysis showed that the average score of the control class was 51.34, and the experimental class was 79.24. T-test showed that the value of the t-count was more significant than the t-table. T-count was 2,790, and the t-table was 2,021. It can be concluded that H1 is accepted. So, applying the contextual learning model can significantly affect students' abilities in writing a short story.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arinkunto, S. (2002). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Aslan, A. (2019). Hidden Curriculum.

Bahekar, A. A., Singh, S., Saha, S., Molnar, J., & Arora, R. (2007). The prevalence and incidence of coronary heart disease is significantly increased in periodontitis: a meta-analysis. American heart journal, 154(5), 830-837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.06.037

Barkhuizen, G. (2017). Investigating multilingual identity in study abroad contexts: A short story analysis approach. System, 71, 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.014

Bungin, B. (2001). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.

Ebersbach, M., & Brandenburger, I. (2020). Reading a short story changes children’s sustainable behavior in a resource dilemma. Journal of experimental child psychology, 191, 104743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104743

Education, A., & Mean, W. D. I. (2013). Affective education and the affective domain: Implications for instructional-design theories and models. Instructional-design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II, 2(1992), 485.

Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 5(3), 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6

Holliday, A. (2010). Analysing qualitative data. Continuum companion to research methods in applied linguistics, 98-110.

Ismail, D. (2013). Penggunaan Pendekatan Kontekstual Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Puisi Di Kelas V Sdn 6 Tibawa Kabupaten Gorontalo. Skripsi, 1(151409395).

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it's here to stay. Corwin Press.

Lewis, J. A., & Gratson, G. M. (2004). Direct writing in three dimensions. Materials today, 7(7-8), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00344-X

MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40(1-2), 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90048-9

Mahendra, I. W. E. (2016). Contextual learning approach and performance assessment in mathematics learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(3), 7-15. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/347

Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2005). A region of proximal learning model of study time allocation. Journal of memory and language, 52(4), 463-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.12.001

Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of informetrics, 4(3), 265-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002

Nurhadi, D., & Pd, M. (2002). Pendekatan Kontekstual (CTL). Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang.

Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative health research, 28(3), 381-388.

Pratt, M. L. (1981). The short story: The long and the short of it. Poetics, 10(2-3), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(81)90033-4

Puspita, L. (2013). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Sekolah Dasar.

Sgier, L. (2012). Qualitative data analysis. An Initiat. Gebert Ruf Stift, 19, 19-21.

Sugiyono, S. (2010). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.

Suroso, A., Hendriarto, P., Mr, G. N. K., Pattiasina, P. J., & Aslan, A. (2021). Challenges and opportunities towards Islamic cultured generation: socio-cultural analysis. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 180-194.

Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis sebagai keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: angkasa.

Yulianti, N. K. D., & Yadnya, I. B. P. (2016). Figurative expressions in the short story of ‘sepotong tubuh’ and their translation into English. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 3(11), 1-7. Retrieved from https://sloap.org/journals/index.php/irjmis/article/view/388

Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of business venturing, 10(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E

Zulela, M. S. (2014). Pendekatan kontekstual dalam pembelajaran menulis di sekolah dasar (Action research di kelas tinggi sekolah dasar). Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 83-91.

Published

2021-10-05

How to Cite

Bakri, M. (2021). The effect of the application of the contextual learning model on the ability of short story writing for class VII SMP. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(6), 524-533. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n6.1939

Issue

Section

Peer Review Articles